No products in the cart.
Section thirteen of your own Government Financial Lender Operate, hence exempts government financial banks and their “advances” out of state income tax, taverns a state of requiring a federal coupons and you will mortgage connection to blow documentary stamp taxes towards the promissory cards conducted by relationship and only a federal mortgage lender to cover fund about financial into organization. Pp. 365 You. S. 518 -524.
Laurens Given. S. & L. Assn. v. Taxation Payment, 365 U.S. 517 (1961)
(a) The brand new immune system provided to help you “advances” out-of a national home loan financial by thirteen of your Federal Financial Lender Work try large enough so you can bar county stamp taxation with the like financing. Pittman v. House Owners’ Financing Corp., 308 U. S. 21 . Pp. 365 You. S. 519 -522.
(b) Section 5(h) of the property Owners’ Loan Operate off 1933, that offers that zero Condition should tax a federal savings and you may financing association in the a high rate than just it taxes most other similar regional common or cooperative thrift and you will home financing institutions, didn’t explicitly or impliedly repeal 13 of your own Federal Mortgage Lender Act, which exempts “advances” of federal mortgage banking institutions out-of county tax. Pp. 365 U. S. 522 -524.
You.S. Best Court
Part 13 of Government Financial Bank Operate, and that exempts federal financial banking companies and their “advances” away from county tax, bars a state out-of requiring a federal savings and you can financing connection to expend documentary Moody payday loan and cash advance stamp taxation to the promissory cards done because of the association in support of a national financial lender to cover fund from the financial towards the association. Pp. 365 U. S. 518 -524.
Laurens Provided. S. & L. Assn. v. Taxation Commission, 365 U.S. 517 (1961)
(a) The immunity granted in order to “advances” away from a federal mortgage bank from the 13 of the Federal Mortgage Bank Act try wider sufficient to help you pub condition stamp fees to the instance that loan. Pittman v. Family Owners’ Loan Corp., 308 You. S. 21 . Pp. 365 You. S. 519 -522.
(b) Area 5(h) of the home Owners’ Loan Work from 1933, which provides one to no County should income tax a federal offers and you may loan relationship at the a high rate than simply they fees almost every other comparable regional mutual or cooperative thrift and you may a mortgage associations, didn’t expressly otherwise impliedly repeal 13 of your Federal Mortgage Lender Operate, which exempts “advances” regarding federal home loan finance companies of condition income tax. Pp. 365 You. S. 522 -524.
Petitioner are a national Coupons and you can Financing Relationship arranged within the Household Owners’ Loan Work from 1933 [Footnote step one] and doing business when you look at the Laurens, Sc. It can be an associate, which have credit privileges, of your own Federal Home loan Bank out-of Greensboro, New york, which was dependent within the Government Mortgage Lender Operate away from 1932. [Footnote 2] For the true purpose of making financial currency obtainable in the community which it caters to, petitioner Government Savings and Financing Connection has actually, due to the fact August several, 1953, shielded “enhances,” otherwise finance, regarding the Government Home loan Financial off Greensboro totalling $5,675,000, by which petitioner done composed promissory notes towards the Financial once the necessary for the new 1932 Operate. The state assessed up against petitioner documentary stamp taxes on these cards from $2,270 under your state law imposing an excellent stamp tax into promissory notes in the rate from five cents for each $100. [Footnote 3] Petitioner paid back such fees below protest after which produced today’s action on the condition legal having refund of one’s commission, [Footnote 4] claiming that the imposition of your own taxes constituted a violent try by Condition in order to tax the newest “advances” of Government Home loan Lender of Greensboro within the pass out-of the brand new provision of 1932